You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Relatively hyperbolic groups’ tag.
Recall, that for any graph we built a combinatorial horoball
. For a group
and a collection of subgroups
and a generating set
, we built the augmented Cayley graph
by gluing copies of
.
is hyperbolic relative to
if and only if
is Gromov hyperbolic.
Exercise 28: If and
are finitely generated, then
is hyperbolic relative
. (Hint:
is a graph of spaces with underlying graph a tree and the combinatorial horoballs for vertex spaces.)
Example: Suppose is a complete hyperbolic manifold of finite volume. So,
acts on
. Let
be a subset of
consisting of points that are the unique fixed point of some element of
. So
acts on
, and there only finitely many orbits. Let
be stabilizers of representatives from these orbits and let
. Then,
is hyperbolic relative to
.
Example: Let be a torsion-free word-hyperbolic group. Then,
is clearly hyperbolic relative to
. A collection of subgroups
is malnormal if for any
,
implies that
and
.
is hyperbolic relative to
if and only if
is malnormal.
The collection of subgroups is the collection of peripheral subgroups.
Lemma 31: If is torsion-free and hyperbolic relative to a set of quasiconvex subgroups
, then
is malnormal.
Sketch of Proof: Suppose that is infinite. Consider the following rectangles: Note that if
, then
is contained in a
-neighborhood of
. Now, there exists infinite sequences
and
such that
. Look at the rectangles with vertices
. The geodesics in
between 1 and
and
and
go arbitrarily deep into the combinatorial horoballs. Therefore, they are arbitrarily far apart. It follows that these rectangles cannot be uniformly slim.
Let where each
. Write
. Call this the Dehn filling of
.
Note: If is hyperbolic relative to
, then
is hyperbolic.
Theorem 21: (Groves-Manning-Osin). Suppose is hyperbolic relative to
. Then, there exists a finite set
contained in
such that whenever
we have
is injective for all
, and
is hyperbolic relative to the collection
;
In particular, if are all hyperbolic, then so is
.
One application of this theorem is a simple proof of a theorem of Gromov, Olshanskii, and Delzant:
Theorem 22: Let be hyperbolic and suppose
is malnormal, with each
infinite. Then, there is constant
such that for all positive integers
there is an epimorphism to a hyperbolic group
such that
for each
.
Some intuition: Recall that if is a closed hyperbolic manifold
then is word-hyperbolic. However, a lot of interesting hyperbolic manifolds are not closed.
Example: Let be the figure 8 knot.

Then the complement
admits a complete hyperbolic metric and is of finite volume.
So, here we have an example of a hyperbolic manifold which is not compact but is of finite volume. This is almost as which is almost as natural as being closed.
is homotopy equivalent to
, the complement of a thickened
in
.

is a compact manifold with boundary and its interior admits a hyperbolic metric. The boundary of
is homeomorphic to a 2-torus, so
induces a map
. By Dehn’s lemma, the map is injective so
cannot be word hyperbolic. The point is that
acts nicely on
but no cocompactly so the Svarc=Milnor lemma does not apply.
The torus boundary component of corresponds to a cusp of
.

The point is that we can use cusped manifolds like to build a lot of manifolds and in particular a lot of hyperbolic manifolds.
Take and a solid Torus
.
Choose a homeomorphism
Definition: The manifold is obtained from
by Dehn filling .
We now want to understand what we have done to . The map
induces a map
:

The surjectivity of follows from the fact that
is a homeomorphism. The Seifert Van Kampen theorem implies that
, where
denotes the normal closure of
.
Gromov-Thurston theorem: Let M be any compact hyperbolic manifold and
be a component of
homeomorphic to a 2-torus for all but finitely many choices of

the Dehn filling is hyperbolic.
Note: by finitely many we mean finitely many maps up to homotopy.
This is a very fruitful way of building hyperbolic manifolds. The next question to ask is whether we can do the same thing for groups. So, now we will try to develop a group theoretic version of this picture.
Let be a group theoretic graph with the induced length metric. Construct a new graph
called the combinatorial horoball on
as follows: Define the vertices
. There are two sorts of edges in
. We say that
and
are joined by a (horizontal) edge if
and
. We say that
and
are joined by a (vertical) edge for all
.

For large enough
and
will have distance one and
iff
iff
.
Exercise 27:
(A). For ,
.
(B). For any connected ,
is Gromov hyperbolic .

Let be a group and let
be a finite set of finitely generated subgroups of
. Choose a finite generating set
for
such that for each
,
generate
. Then
contains natural copies of
.
Construct the augmented Cayley graph by gluing on combinatorial horoballs equivariantly.
where for each
and each /
,
is glued to
along
.
Definition: G is hyperbolic rel if and only if
is Gromov hyperbolic for some (any) choice of
.


Recent Comments