You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Elevations’ tag.
Lemma 29: Suppose is a finite set of infinite degree elvations and
is compact. Then for all sufficiently large
, there exists an intermediate covering
such that
(a) embeds in
(b) every descends to an elevation
of degree
(c) the are pairwise distinct
Proof: We claim that the images of never share an infinite ray (a ray is an isometric embedding of
). Neither do two ends of the same elevation
. Let’s claim by passing to the universal cover of
, a tree
.
For each , lift
to a map
. If
and
share an infinite ray then there exists
such that
and
overlay in an infinite ray. The point is that
correspond to cosets
and
. But this implies that
This implies that . So
. A similar argument implies that the two ends of
do not overlap in an infinite ray. This proves the claim.
Let be the core of
. Enlarging
if necessary, we can assume that
(i) ;
(ii) is a connected subgraph;
(iii) for each , for some
,
;
(iv) for each ,
.
For each identifying
with
so that
is identified with
and
is identified with
. Let
For all sufficiently large ,
Now, the restriction of factors through
, where
. This is a finite-to-one immersion, so, by theorem 5, we can complete it to a finite-sheeted covering map as required.
Theorem 19: is LERF.
Recall the set-up from the previous lecture. We built a graph of spaces for
.
Proof: Let be finitely generated. Let
be the corresponding covering space of
and let
be compact. Because
is finitely generated, there exists a subgraph of spaces
such that
. We can take
large enough so that
. We can enlarge
so that it contains every finite-degree edge space of
. Also enlarge
so that
for any . For each
let
and let
incident edge map of infinite degree
.
Applying lemma 29 to , for some large
, set
. (Here we use the fact that vertex groups of
are finitely generated)
Define as follows:
For each
, the edge space is the
that the lemma produced from the corresponding
.
Now, by construction, can be completed to a graph of spaces
so that the map
factors through and
embeds. Let
be identical to
except with +’s and -’s exchanged. Clearly
satisfies Stallings condition, as required.
Agol-Groves-Manning’s Theorem predicts that, for every word-hyperbolic group we can easily construct, every quasiconvex subgroup is separable (otherwise, we would find a non-residually finite hyperbolic group!).
In this section, we use graphs of groups to build new hyperbolic groups:
Combination Theorem (Bestvina & Feighn): If is a malnormal subgroup of hyperbolic groups
, then
is hyperbolic.
Recall: is called a malnormal subgroup of
if it satisfies: if
, then
.
For a proof, see M. Bestvina and M. Feighn, “A combination theorem for negatively curved groups”, J. Differential Geom., 35 (1992), 85–101.
Example: Let be free,
not a proper power. By Lemma 11,
is malnormal, so
is hyperbolic. As a special case, if
is closed surface of even genus
, considered as the connected sum of two copies of the closed surface of genus
, then by Seifert-van Kampen Theorem,
for some
.
Question: (a) Which subgroups of are quasiconvex? (b) Which subgroups of
are separable?
We will start by trying to answer (b). The following is an outline of the argument: Let be a finite graph so that
, let
be two copies of
. Realize
as maps
, where
. Let
be the graph of spaces with vertex spaces
, edge space
, and edge maps
. Then clearly,
, and finitely generated subgroups
are in correspondence with covering spaces
. We can then use similar technique to sections 27 and 28.
Let us now make a few remarks about elevations of loops. Let be a loop in some space
, i.e.,
and
. Consider an elevation of
:

The conjugacy classes of subgroups of are naturally in bijection with
. The degree of the elevation is equal to the degree of the covering map
.
Definition: Suppose is a covering map and
is an intermediate covering space, i.e.,
factors through
, and we have a diagram

If and
are elevations of
and the diagram commutes, then we say that
descends to
.
Let be a finite graph,
a finitely generated subgroup and
a loop. Let
be a covering space corresponding to
.
Lemma 29: Consider a finite collection of elevations of
to
, each of infinite degree. Let
be compact. Then for all sufficiently large
, there exists an intermediate, finite-sheeted covering space
satisfying: (a)
embeds in
; (b) every
descends to an elevation
of degree exactly
; (c) these
are pairwise distinct.
Recall that our goal is to determine, for a given map of graphs of spaces such as the one shown below, whether the map can be extended to a covering map
.

Figure 1
Let be graphs of spaces equipped with maps
,
and
as before. Recall that in Stallings’ proof of Hall’s Theorem, we completed an immersion to a covering map by gluing in edges. We will aim to do the same thing with graphs of spaces.
Definition: Let be a graph of spaces, and let
be the map to the underlying graph. If
is a subgraph, then
has a graph-of-spaces structure
with underlying graph
. Call
a subgraph of spaces of
.
We’re seeking a condition on such that
is realized as a subgraph of spaces of some
with a covering map
such that the following diagram commutes:
Definition: For each edge map of
, and each
a vertex of
, let
.
For each possible degree , let
be the set of elevations of degree
. We will say
satisfies Stallings’ condition if and only if the following two things hold:
(a) Every edge map of is an elevation of the appropriate edge map of
.
(b) For each and
, there is a bijection
.
So in Figure 1, the graph of spaces is something you might be able to turn into a covering. In the picture,
is represented by the blue circles, and
is represented by the green circles. Observe that the blue circles are in bijection with the green circles.
Corollary: satisfies Stallings’ condition if and only if
can be realized as a subgraph of spaces of some
such that
(a) , and
(b) there is a covering map such that the following diagram commutes:

Proof of Corollary. First we’ll show that if can be extended to a covering map as described above, then
satisfies Stallings’ condition. By Theorem 17, every edge map of
is an elevation. So there are inclusions

Furthermore, these maps are surjective, and clearly degree-preserving.
Now assume that satisfies Stallings’ condition. Then we build
as follows. Let
. As above, we have degree-preserving inclusions (this time, not surjections)

Extend these inclusions to bijections . Now we set
. Each of these
is an elevation

This defines an edge space and an edge map
. Consider the corresponding elevation in
:

Because and
are of the same degree, we have a covering transformation
. So we can identify them, and use
as the other edge map. By construction,
satisfies the conditions of Theorem 17, so there is a suitable covering map
.
Exercise 25: (This will be easier later, but we have the tools necessary to do this now.) Prove that if and
are LERF groups, then so is
.


Recent Comments