You are currently browsing yyao392c’s articles.
Agol-Groves-Manning’s Theorem predicts that, for every word-hyperbolic group we can easily construct, every quasiconvex subgroup is separable (otherwise, we would find a non-residually finite hyperbolic group!).
In this section, we use graphs of groups to build new hyperbolic groups:
Combination Theorem (Bestvina & Feighn): If is a malnormal subgroup of hyperbolic groups
, then
is hyperbolic.
Recall: is called a malnormal subgroup of
if it satisfies: if
, then
.
For a proof, see M. Bestvina and M. Feighn, “A combination theorem for negatively curved groups”, J. Differential Geom., 35 (1992), 85–101.
Example: Let be free,
not a proper power. By Lemma 11,
is malnormal, so
is hyperbolic. As a special case, if
is closed surface of even genus
, considered as the connected sum of two copies of the closed surface of genus
, then by Seifert-van Kampen Theorem,
for some
.
Question: (a) Which subgroups of are quasiconvex? (b) Which subgroups of
are separable?
We will start by trying to answer (b). The following is an outline of the argument: Let be a finite graph so that
, let
be two copies of
. Realize
as maps
, where
. Let
be the graph of spaces with vertex spaces
, edge space
, and edge maps
. Then clearly,
, and finitely generated subgroups
are in correspondence with covering spaces
. We can then use similar technique to sections 27 and 28.
Let us now make a few remarks about elevations of loops. Let be a loop in some space
, i.e.,
and
. Consider an elevation of
:

The conjugacy classes of subgroups of are naturally in bijection with
. The degree of the elevation is equal to the degree of the covering map
.
Definition: Suppose is a covering map and
is an intermediate covering space, i.e.,
factors through
, and we have a diagram

If and
are elevations of
and the diagram commutes, then we say that
descends to
.
Let be a finite graph,
a finitely generated subgroup and
a loop. Let
be a covering space corresponding to
.
Lemma 29: Consider a finite collection of elevations of
to
, each of infinite degree. Let
be compact. Then for all sufficiently large
, there exists an intermediate, finite-sheeted covering space
satisfying: (a)
embeds in
; (b) every
descends to an elevation
of degree exactly
; (c) these
are pairwise distinct.
We will see two examples of non-quasiconvex subgroups in this section. The first one is NOT a hyperbolic group, while the second one is.
Example: For the first example, let
,
with one eigenvalue (the larger one) . Notice that
does not fix any non-zero vectors in
(such a map
is called Anosov).
Now let . This is a group. The group law works like this: for any
,
. Pick
,
. The map
is, by the following analysis, NOT a quasi-embedding:
Choose such that
. All norms on
are bilipschitz, so there exists
such that
. Therefore, for sufficiently large
,
, and so
. On the other side, we have
. It follows that
is not a quasi-embedding.
Example: For the second example, let be a hyperbolic surface. An automorphism
of
is called pseudo-Anosov if for any smooth closed curve
on
and any
,
is not homotopic to
. Let
be the mapping torus of
, i.e.,
, with the relation
generated by
.
Under these assumptions, we are able to use a theorem of Thurston asserting that, must be a hyperbolic 3-manifold. (W. Thurston, “On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. vol 19 (1988), 417-431)
Hence, if is closed, then
is also closed. So
acts nicely on
(actually
), and so is word-hyperbolic by the Švarc-Milnor Lemma. Then a similar argument to the previous shows the natural map
is NOT a quasi-embedding.
For concrete examples, see A. Casson & S. Bleiler, “Automorphisms of Surfaces After Nielsen and Thurston”.
After the two examples, let us switch to a property for all hyperbolic groups:
Theorem 7: Hyperbolic groups are finitely presented.
In order to prove this theorem, we need the following lemma:
Lemma 9: Let be two geodesics in a
-hyperbolic metric space
,
. (If
is longer than
, say, then extend
by the constant map). Then for any
,
.
Proof: Case 1: there is such that
. Without loss of generality, assume
, then
. So,
.
Case 2: there is no such that
. Then
must be within distance
of
. Apply a similar argument to the previous, we see
.
Proof of Theorem 7: Let be
-hyperbolic, with the generating set
. Let
be any relation, which corresponds to a loop in the Cayley graph
. We can always take
with
and
geodesics in
and
, by “triangulating”.
Write ,
. Denote
,
,
. An easy induction shows that
.
But Lemma 9 implies that for all
, so we have written the loop
as a product of conjugates of loops of length at most
. Therefore, the set of all loops of length at most
is a finite set of relations for
.

Recent Comments