Lemma 27 Revisited. Suppose is a covering map. Then there is a covering map
such that
is the fibre product of
and
.
Proof. Let be the fibre product of
and
. There is a map
given by
. Let
be the fibre product of
and
; i.e.
.

There is a map given by
. This is a covering map and injective, so it is a homeomorphism.
Let be continuous,
be a covering map and
,
choices of basepoint. We have already seen that a choice of
such that
determines an elevation of
to
at
. Fix such a
. The pre-image of
in
is in bijection with the set of cosets
This raises the question, when do two cosets determine the same elevation?
Exercise 24. and
determine the same elevation if and only if
;
that is, the set of elevations of to
is in bijection with
.
Let and
be graphs of spaces and suppose we have the following data.
(a) A combinatorial map given by
and
.
(b) Covering maps for each
.
(c) Covering maps for each
, such that
whenever
adjoins
.
This determines a continuous map . When is
really a covering map?
Theorem 17. is a covering map if
(i) for all adjoining
, the edge map
is an elevation of
; and
(ii) wherever adjoining
and
, every elevation
to
arises as an edge map of
.
Proof (sketch). It’s enough to consider our local model : and
.
and
be covering maps defining
and a map
. By Lemma 27,
is a covering map if and only if
is a fibre product with respect to some covering:
Every map in the diagram is injective, so (for each component)
and it follows that is the fibre product of
and
. The result follows.

Leave a comment
Comments feed for this article